Monday, September 28, 2026

At What Point Are Yields Crazy?

First, I'll answer the question in the title. A 20% yield is crazy in terms of not having a realistic shot of being sustainable. Maybe the crazy threshold should be a little lower but twenty for sure. 

We've spent some time on developing a bridging strategy to make a smaller piece of money, smaller in relation to a rollover IRA, last for some number of years until the next financial milestone like starting Social Security or taking RMDs. Sticking with the ten year example we've worked before, we'd be willing to spend 1/10th of the original balance each year, depleting to zero after ten years. With that in mind can we take that big distribution and have something left over at the ten year mark or make that pot of money last longer. 

I've said this research is probably aimed at our (my wife and me) financial situation at some point down the road. We've looked at some crazy combinations that I probably wouldn't want to pursue but I think by adding one of those distributing ladder ETF, we can dial the crazy way down.

Here's the latest version, TIPB matures in 2035 which does not fit in with my timeline for any of this but will do for long term research/following.

The highest yielder is CAIE at 14% so we're nowhere near crazy if we're sticking with 20%. There's not much equity beta but there is some. The backtest can only go back a year so there's not a lot of useful information but here it is.


The yield is 8.25% which is pretty high considering how much is in TIPB and JAAA. TIPB though has a sneaky high yield and the first tranche of TIPS in the fund will mature next month which will kick the "yield" up considerably when it returns principal as it is designed to do. 

If we implemented this with $450,000 and took out $11,250 per calendar quarter in a ten year period that was identical to 01/01/2000-12/31/2009, Copilot says there would be $330,000 left over. The next stress test was a ten year period where the yield on the ten year US treasury went from 1.5% to 7% over a ten year period. In that scenario, everything else being the same, Copilot says $106,000 would be left over. Rates can't start at 1.5% because were at five and change but the point is something terrible happening in the bond market.

I would imagine the product landscape continues to improve, maybe in six-eight years when I might need to consider this, it can be a little more robust.

The information, analysis and opinions expressed herein reflect our judgment and opinions as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time without notice. They are not intended to constitute legal, tax, securities or investment advice or a recommended course of action in any given situation.

2 comments:

Ernle said...

Some food for thought - https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/29/investors-who-have-shunned-diversification-face-maybe-the-best-buying-opportunity-for-bonds-in-decades.html

Roger Nusbaum said...

Santoli is always a good read, miss him from Barron's. I think it comes down to individual perceptions of being compensated adequately for the risk and the volatility of longer maturities. More and more people seem to think 5.xx% is that point and they may turn out to be correct. For me, I just think are are a lot of other sources of carry where the yields are the same or higher with nowhere near the same type of volatility.

How Diversification Is Supposed To Work

Let's start with this. If inflation continues to run at about 3.5% then that implies a real return of 3.5% versus 4.56% real return for ...